Enterprise Pricing

Pricing at a company this size doesn't live in one place. I mapped the chaos, defined the real workflow, and designed a tool people would actually use.

company

Anheuser-Busch

timeline

2025

role

process design ux strategy stakeholder management
I.

The problem

Pricing decisions at a company this size don't live in one place. When I joined this initiative, the process was fragmented across multiple systems: Excel was the preferred method (and had been for years), critical context lived in email threads, raw data came from a legacy internal tool that queried the data, and there was an existing solution in Palantir that nobody wanted to use.

The Palantir implementation was technically capable but widely distrusted. Users found the UI overly complex for what they actually needed, and more critically, they didn't trust the data. When people don't trust the system, they build workarounds. In this case, the workaround was a sprawling network of spreadsheets that only a few people fully understood.

"Some of the data you end up seeing [in Palantir] can be inaccurate. It's not very user-friendly visually, and it doesn't build trust"

II.

My role

My job wasn't to make it pretty. It was to make it make sense. I partnered with my PM to untangle what existed and define what the workflow actually needed to be.

Led discovery sessions with stakeholders across multiple business units

Mapped existing processes and identified bottlenecks

Defined requirements in collaboration with PM and engineering

Designed the end-to-end workflow and interface

Facilitated alignment between teams with competing priorities

III.

The approach

Before designing anything, we needed to understand what actually happened. The existing process had evolved organically over years, with different teams doing different versions of the same thing.

01

Discovery

Interviewed stakeholders across business units to understand how pricing decisions were actually made versus how they were supposed to be made.

02

Process Mapping

Documented the current state: who does what, where data lives, what breaks down, and where decisions get stuck.

03

Definition

Worked with PM to define what the workflow should be, identifying which steps were essential and which were artifacts of outdated processes.

04

Design & Validation

Designed the tool interface and workflow, validating with users at each stage to ensure it matched how they actually needed to work.

IV.

Artifacts

Pricing Users

Region Pricing Analyst

Region Pricing Analyst

Submit data-driven pricing decisions that maximize regional sales while adhering to company policies.

Highest PCR (Price Change Request) submission volume

Revenue Management

Revenue Management

Review PCRs to ensure alignment with pricing strategy, revenue targets, and brand principles.

10-15K reviews annually

Price Ops Coordinator

Price Ops Coordinator

Execute approved changes in system of record and bring pricing decisions to market.

Most time spent in tool

Commercial Manager

Commercial Manager

Ensure pricing strategies support commercial team goals and market competitiveness.

Initiates pricing requests

V.

Process

User Journey

Before - Fragmented across systems

external triggers

Competition adjusts price
Wholesaler requests change

Field communication

Wholesaler → CD → Email to analyst

handoff

Region RMSI receives request

Internal system fragmentation (the pain)

PCC
PRC 2.0
Manual selections
Palantir
Update tracking #
Tag 2nd reviewer
RMIS data pull
Manual verification
Email confirmation

after - simplified flow

01

external trigger

Competition or wholesaler initiates request

02

RMSI Receives

Analyst identifies pricing action needed

03

Create & Submit

Simulate, review, submit in one place

04

Review & Approve

Routing and tracking automated

05

Execute

Push to system of record

06

Confirm

Automated notification to requestor

✓ Consolidates 4 systems into one